Printer-friendly versionSend by emailPDF version
TitleEnergy deficit after exercise augments lipid mobilization but does not contribute to the exercise-induced increase in insulin sensitivity
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2010
AuthorsNewsom, S. A., Schenk S., Thomas K. M., Harber M. P., Knuth N. D., Goldenberg N., & Horowitz J. F.
JournalJournal of Applied Physiology (Bethesda, Md.: 1985)
Volume108
Issue3
Pagination554 - 560
Date Published2010/03//
ISBN Number1522-1601
KeywordsAdaptation, Physiological, Adult, Biopsy, Blood Glucose, Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted, Energy Intake, Energy Metabolism, Exercise, Glucose Tolerance Test, Glycogen, Humans, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Kinetics, Lipid Metabolism, Male, Muscle, Skeletal, Oxidation-Reduction, Palmitic Acid, Triglycerides
Abstract

The content of meals consumed after exercise can impact metabolic responses for hours and even days after the exercise session. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of low dietary carbohydrate (CHO) vs. low energy intake in meals after exercise on insulin sensitivity and lipid metabolism the next day. Nine healthy men participated in four randomized trials. During the control trial (CON) subjects remained sedentary. During the other three trials, subjects exercised [65% peak oxygen consumption (Vo(2 peak)); cycle ergometer and treadmill exercise] until they expended approximately 800 kcal. Dietary intake during CON and one exercise trial (BAL) was designed to provide sufficient energy and carbohydrate to maintain nutrient balance. In contrast, the diets after the other two exercise trials were low in either CHO (LOW-CHO) or energy (LOW-EN). The morning after exercise we obtained a muscle biopsy, assessed insulin sensitivity (S(i); intravenous glucose tolerance test) and measured lipid kinetics (isotope tracers). Although subjects were in energy balance during both LOW-CHO and CON, the lower muscle glycogen concentration during LOW-CHO vs. CON (402 +/- 29 vs. 540 +/- 33 mmol/kg dry wt, P < 0.01) coincided with a significant increase in S(i) [5.2 +/- 0.7 vs. 3.8 +/- 0.7 (mU/l)(-1) x min(-1); P < 0.05]. Conversely, despite ingesting several hundred fewer kilocalories after exercise during LOW-EN compared with BAL, this energy deficit did not affect S(i) the next day [4.9 +/- 0.9, and 5.0 +/- 0.8 (mU/l)(-1) x min(-1)]. Maintaining an energy deficit after exercise had the most potent effect on lipid metabolism, as measured by a higher plasma triacylglycerol concentration, and increased plasma fatty acid mobilization and oxidation compared with when in nutrient balance. Carbohydrate deficit after exercise, but not energy deficit, contributed to the insulin-sensitizing effects of acute aerobic exercise, whereas maintaining an energy deficit after exercise augmented lipid mobilization.

URLhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20044472

Your Kinesiology Connection

Return to top